Comparison
OKLocate vs Azure Maps
Microsoft's location platform: geocoding, maps, routing and weather, worldwide, inside Azure.
Where OKLocate is the better choice
US property intelligence and a price you can read on a web page. No Azure commitment, no transaction meter, no enterprise agreement, and measurements of the building that Azure Maps does not offer at all.
Where Azure Maps is the better choice
Azure integration and worldwide coverage. If your billing, identity and compliance already live in Azure, that is a real advantage we cannot match.
| OKLocate | Azure Maps | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat monthly | Per transaction |
| Store the results | Yes, no time limit | Restricted by terms |
| Licensing shape | One licence, every product, no storage tier | Terms govern caching and redistribution |
| Coverage | United States | Worldwide |
| Cloud integration | Any, plain HTTP | Azure native |
| LiDAR point cloud per house | Included | Not offered |
| Property measurements | 88 columns | Not offered |
What it would cost you
Put your own volume in. Every field is editable, and the answer says so when Azure Maps works out cheaper.
Pre-filled for Azure Maps. Per transaction, inside an Azure subscription. Figures from the geocod.io comparison of geocoding services, July 2026. Edit anything to match your own contract.
You would save
$203/mo
$2,430 a year, and the results are yours to keep.
In short
Choose Azure Maps to stay inside Azure. Choose OKLocate for US property intelligence at a flat rate.
Figures for OKLocate are the ones this site publishes everywhere else. Claims about Azure Maps describe their published model, not a price. Check their own pricing page for current rates.