Comparison
OKLocate vs Radar
Geocoding, search and geofencing with mobile SDKs, positioned as a Google Maps alternative.
Where OKLocate is the better choice
The property rather than the device. Radar knows where a phone is; we know what the building is made of, searchable across a county, with imagery and LiDAR in the same flat-rate key.
Where Radar is the better choice
Geofencing and the mobile SDKs around it. If you need to know when a device enters a zone, Radar is built for that and we are not.
| OKLocate | Radar | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat monthly | Per request |
| Store the results | Yes, no time limit | Plan dependent |
| Licensing shape | One licence, every product, no storage tier | Storage rights vary by plan |
| Geofencing / SDKs | Not offered | Core product |
| Base map and tiles | Included | Included |
| Aerial imagery | Included | Not offered |
| LiDAR point cloud per house | Included | Not offered |
| Property measurements | 88 columns | Not offered |
What it would cost you
Put your own volume in. Every field is editable, and the answer says so when Radar works out cheaper.
Pre-filled for Radar. Not in the source survey. Enter the rate on your own plan. Figures from the geocod.io comparison of geocoding services, July 2026. Edit anything to match your own contract.
You would save
$125/mo
$1,500 a year, and the results are yours to keep.
In short
Choose Radar for device location and geofencing. Choose OKLocate when the subject is the property rather than the phone.
Figures for OKLocate are the ones this site publishes everywhere else. Claims about Radar describe their published model, not a price. Check their own pricing page for current rates.