Comparison
OKLocate vs Hexagon
Large-scale aerial and satellite imagery programmes sold as content subscriptions.
Where OKLocate is the better choice
The measurement, not the picture. Hexagon sells imagery; we sell what is in it, per house, through an API, with the point cloud and 88 derived columns and a published price.
Where Hexagon is the better choice
Imagery at a scale and cadence we do not fly. Hexagon owns capture; we read public imagery and public LiDAR.
| OKLocate | Hexagon | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat monthly | Content subscription |
| Published prices | Yes, on the site | Contact sales |
| Derived measurements | 88 columns | Imagery, not insights |
| Per-house API | Yes | Not the model |
| Store the results | Yes, no time limit | Licence dependent |
| Licensing shape | One licence, every product, no storage tier | Content licence, seats and territory |
What it would cost you
Put your own volume in. Every field is editable, and the answer says so when Hexagon works out cheaper.
Enter what you pay today. Nothing is sent anywhere; this runs in your browser.
You would save
$250/mo
$3,000 a year, and the results are yours to keep.
In short
Choose Hexagon when you need imagery itself, at their resolution. Choose OKLocate when you need what the imagery MEANS, per house, through an API.
Figures for OKLocate are the ones this site publishes everywhere else. Claims about Hexagon describe their published model, not a price. Check their own pricing page for current rates.