Property search

Search every house for what matters

Available

Use the data from our property profile to search for homes that meet your criteria.

Illinois, Florida, Texas, New York, Colorado, Arizona, California and Pennsylvania today — National coverage arrives in Q4. Email team@oklocate.com if you would like your state prioritised.

Try it now

Plain English, one county at a time. We show you how we read it before we show you what matched, so a misreading is obvious rather than invisible.

This demo covers Illinois and Florida.

See the homes with a pool and strong solar potentialA pool, plus 1,000+ sq ft of south roof big enough and shallow enough to mount onCook County, ILGround slopes toward the houseDrainage running at the foundation — a FEMA zone cannot tell you thisPeoria County, IL1,000+ sq ft of mountable south roofMeasured per face, gated on a face big and shallow enough to useDuPage County, ILComplex roofsMany planes, which is what makes a re-roof quote moveLake County, ILCanopy within 5 ft of the structureVegetation against the building, from the point cloudMcHenry County, ILPools on complex roofs, 2+ storeysThree measurements at once, one requestWill County, IL
Build your own search

Not offered here: Solar panel detection finds fewer than half of all installations, so a count across a county would be roughly half the truth. It answers one property at a time — filterable through the API, where the caveat travels with it.

Not offered here: Solar potential area is reliable SUMMED over a county — within 10% of the surveyed answer — and unreliable for any single house: it reports usable roof on 18.1% of houses that have none, and returns zero for almost nobody, so a threshold cannot separate a population. Filter on South-facing roof area instead, which is measured per face.

Or ask in plain English

homes with pools in Cook Countydetached homes in DuPage Countyhomes with pools in Lake County

What you would use it for

Underwriting a book

Screen every property in a portfolio for the physical risks that drive a claim — roof condition, drainage falling the wrong way, vegetation against the structure — before anyone orders an inspection.

Sizing an exposure

Count how much of a book sits behind a given characteristic, then decide whether it is worth pricing differently.

Targeting a campaign

Find the houses that could take what you are selling. Roof area and orientation for solar, lot relief for drainage work, pool for a service route.

A record is not a report

A search returns records, not profiles. A record is the address and the fields your query was about — enough to decide which properties are worth a closer look. Opening the full profile on one of them is a second call against the same allowance. They are not the same thing at two prices; they carry different things and each costs one call.

That is the funnel working rather than a hole in it: search tells you which houses deserve a closer look, and a property profile is what you open on the ones that do.

Pricing

One subscription covers property lookup and property search. A search and a profile each cost one call against the same allowance, so there is nothing to work out in advance about which one to reach for.

Search is not priced separately, and it is not priced per record. The plans, the included volumes and the overage rates are all on the pricing page. Storage rights start on Builder, which is what lets you keep the rows a search returns instead of paying to ask again.

What triage actually costs

Screening a book of 100,000 properties takes 100 search calls — a search reports the full match count however large it is, and returns up to 1,000 rows a call — then 500 profile calls on the ones worth opening. That is 600 calls against the Scale plan's 10,000 included, so screening the whole book costs nothing beyond the monthly plan. Only then do you pay anyone for a full record on whatever survives that.

What it will not do

A search aggregates, and some of these measurements are honest about one house while being wrong about a population. That distinction is carried through the interface rather than quietly averaged away.

Solar cannot be used to count installations

The detector is 85.9% precise when it flags a property, but finds only 43.7% of the installations that exist. It is good at telling you about a house and bad at telling you about a county: any count over a geography will be badly low. Use it to flag individual properties, not to size a market.

Both figures are hand-checked against reviewed labels. The full provenance is in the data dictionary.

Coverage is Illinois today and expands by state, so a national query is not something we can answer yet. The coverage page lists it county by county.

When you can have it

The endpoint is not built. This page describes what it will be and what it will cost, so you can tell us now whether the shape is wrong — which is more use to us than finding out after we have built it.

The measurements behind it already exist and you can query them one address at a time today, on the property profile. Progress is on the roadmap.

Other products

Property profile

One address in, every measurement we hold for that house.

Aerial imagery

30cm imagery and spectral overlays, as tiles on your own map.

LiDAR

What a laser measures that a photograph cannot.

Mapping

An OpenStreetMap basemap with no egress fees.

Geocoding

Address to coordinate and back, for all fifty states.

Typeahead (autocomplete)

The dropdown that completes an address as someone types.